Having a chief sustainability officer and an electric vehicle charging network clearly helps, but there are other interconnected challenges, such as housing affordability and income equality, that cities need to address to make lasting progress.” “There is no single solution that can propel a city to be sustainable. “Every city is unique with its own blend of strengths and weaknesses,” said Arcadis Global Cities Director, John Batten. As cities race to meet Paris Agreement commitments by 2030, placing equal value on all three pillars will yield the greatest results. This indicates that excellence in one category alone is not enough for long-term prosperity. While the top ten had the highest combined scores, no city ranked in the top ten across all three pillars of the report. The research also highlights various strengths and opportunities of specific cities, to simplify the complex factors that contribute to the urban experience. Comprising 51 different metrics across 26 separate indicators, together the three pillars signal overall prosperity and reflect the many intertwined services and outcomes cities need to consider in pursuing their sustainability goals. The Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index 2022 ranks cities on three pillars of sustainability: planet, people, and profit. Tokyo, Seattle and San Francisco were also recognized among the top ten most sustainable cities. Oslo led the index, followed by many European cities. Greater focus on prosperity and quality of life needed over the pursuit of profitĪmsterdam, J– Arcadis today released its Sustainable Cities Index 2022, which evaluates overall prosperity in 100 global cities.North American cities lead in profit and economic success but lag in the people and planet rankings.Oslo and European capitals rank as the world’s most sustainable cities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |